David Lynch
On Lost Highway
A surreal meditation on love, jealousy, identity and reality.
By Frederick Szebin and Steve Biodrowski
David Lynch. The name is
synonymous to film-goers
around the world with the
cinema of the abstract, the
surreal, and the obtuse. The
director of ERASERHEAD,
DUNE, and BLUE VELVET,
offers his first feature since
TWIN PEAKS: FIRE WALK
WITH ME. This latest work,
LOST HIGHWAY, is a dual-storied (or is it the same story?),
noirish tale of lust and murder.
Or is it?
Lynch co-wrote the script with Barry Gifford, whose novel Wild at Heart, provided the basis for the director's 1990 motion picture. Bill Pullman (INDEPENDENCE DAY) stars with Patricia Arquette (ED WOOD), Balthazar Getty (MR. HOLLAND'S OPUS), Robert Loggia (INDEPENDENCE DAY), Robert Blake (IN COLD BLOOD), Gary Busey (SILVER BULLET), and Richard Pryor (STIR CRAZY). The film received a limited release in February, with a nationwide release in March.
LOST HIGHWAY follows
Fred Madison (Pullman), a jazz-musician convicted of murdering his wife, Renee (Arquette).
But this plot mutates (along
with its protagonist) into the
story of Pete Dayton (Getty), a
young mechanic who may or
may not be another version of
Fred, who carries on a dangerous liaison with the mistress of
a gangster (also played by
Arquette who). This all takes
place in an imaginary Los
Angeles that seems to have
emerged from a parallel universe, and is overseen by the
Mystery Man (Blake), a ghostly figure who may (or may not)
have supernatural powers. Film
noir, German Expressionism,
and French New Wave meld to
create a story that may never
have happened, could be a
dream, or a representation of
madness.
If you expect the film's ultimate meaning to be defined by its director and co-writer, you'd be sorely disappointed. While talking about his latest film, Lynch prefers to be vague about its meanings, choosing to emphasize the effectiveness of cinema as an art form, rather than commenting on the meaning of his own work.
"I had been thinking about
identity," he said. "This came
up in my discussions with
Barry Gifford and is one of the
things LOST HIGHWAY is
about." Which is as concrete as
the director is likely to be.
This is the first time Gifford and Lynch collaborated on a script face to face (Lynch adapted WILD AT HEART on his own). "It was great," Lynch says of actually writing with Gifford. "Everybody is different. When you have Person A writing with Person F, it goes a certain way. And if Person A writes with Person G, it goes another way. The interaction is based on the individuals in their room, and the process is interesting. I trust Barry's instincts. We like similar things and had a great time."
For a film steeped in technique and style, its origins were
surprisingly low-tech. Gifford,
who does not use a word
processor, said he "would just
write on long, yellow legal tablets, and an assistant would
type it up. We're both very hard
workers, and we concentrate
well. We begin, and we just go
through it and knock ourselves
out."
Gifford calls Lynch's film of WILD AT HEART " great big dark musical comedy. What David managed to keep was the focus, the tenderness between Sailor and Lula, the integrity it also inspired him to go of into different directions."
Judging from those differences between the novel and the film, one might assume that LOST HIGHWAY fit a similar pattern, with Gifford supplying a basic, solid narrative, and Lynch inserting those identifiably Lynchian touches. Actually, both writers claim the collaboration was far more integral than that. According to Lynch, when one of them came up with an idea, it was instantly reshaped by the other person, then checked and re-checked by each other. One idea can have repercussions on what has come before, and all previous work had to be changed because of it. Lynch referred to the collaboration as "an unfolding, beautiful process." Gifford concurred, saying, "I really wouldn't work with anybody I don't respect. That doesn't mean you always love the result. But in this case, it's a challenge." That challenge consisted of trusting Lynch to visualize the outrageous ideas they were putting on paper. "There's a thing, where Michael Massee as Andy gets stuck on the table-that's so amazing the way David filmed it!" Gifford enthused. "We wrote it, thinking, 'If a guy launched himself at somebody like that, could his head get embedded?' Remember how your mother told you to be careful around the comers of a glass table? We were taking that fantasy, like 'Don't play with that BB gun; you'll shoot your eye out.' It's the same kind of thing: what's the most horrific thing that could happen, and could it really happen? David said, 'Don't worry about it; just write it. I'll worry about how to make it happen.' Having complete confidence in him that way is very liberating."
As horrible as this particular
image is, the precision of the
execution renders it almost
comic, in a strange way. "It's
all just fantastic," said Gifford.
"It's sort of beyond black
humor. Because we had this
freedom of being in a fantasy
world, more or less, we could
do anything. If spaceships came
down, which they practically
did, it wouldn't be out of context, given where we're at.
That's a tremendous structure; I
don't know if everyone understood it once we sprang it on
them."
Indeed, many have been perplexed by LOST HIGHWAY. Gifford, however, insists that there is a completely rational explanation for the apparently surreal events on screen. [See sidebar] According to Gifford, Fred Madison is suffering a kind of psychological fugue, a condition in which a person creates another identity for himself. This is manifested in the film when Fred literally transforms into Pete, a younger character with his own identity and past history, for the film's second plot. This is far too much analysis for Lynch, who prefers to leave interpretation to viewers.
"Barry may have his idea of what the film means," said Lynch, "and I may have my own idea, and they may be two different things. And yet, we worked together on the same film. The beauty of a film that is more abstract is everybody has a different take. Nobody agrees on anything in the world today. When you are spoon-fed a film, more people instantly know what it is. I love things that leave room to dream and are open to various interpretations. It's a beautiful thing. It doesn't do any good for Barry to say 'This is what it means.' Film is what it means. If Barry or anyone else could capture what the film is in words, then that's poetry."
Still, Lynch insists he isn't being deliberately obtuse; he may not favor advancing a specific interpretation, but he does want the film open to interpretation. "There is a key in the film as to its meaning," Lynch continued, "but keys are weird. There are surface keys, and there are deeper keys. Intellectual thinking leaves you high and dry sometimes. Intuitive thinking where you get a marriage of feelings and intellect lets you feel the answers where you may not be able to articulate them. Those kinds of things are used in life a lot, but we don't use them too much in cinema. There are films that stay more on the surface, and there's no problem interpreting their meaning."
One key to interpreting the film mayor may - or may not - rest in the character known only as the Mystery Man. Played by Robert Blake, best known for realistic, streetwise characters such as BARETTA, the Mystery Man is the first overt moment in the film when the picture steps beyond the bounds of reality. He's a ghostly figure who can call himself on the phone and possibly direct Fate. He may even be Fate personified or Fred's conscience. Or not.
"The Mystery Man came from an old idea I had," said Lynch. "I told Barry a version of what ended up in the film. I was halfway through the story, and it looked like he wasn't listening to me. He just said, 'That's it!' and started writing stuff down. The character came out of a feeling of a man who, whether real or not, gave the impression that he was supernatural."
Blake may seem an odd choice for the role, but Lynch admires the Emmy and People's Choice Award-winner not only for his skill as an actor, but for his uncompromising honesty. Wanting to work with Blake for quite a while, Lynch cast the actor against type even though Blake admitted that he didn't understand the script. "He was willing to take a chance," says Lynch. "Somewhere in talking and rehearsing, there is a magical moment where actors catch a current, they're on the right road. If they really catch it, then whatever they do from then on is correct and it all comes out of them from that point on."
Helping Lynch visualize his surreal Los Angeles were two longtime collaborators: producer-editor Mary Sweeney (BLUE VELVET, WILD AT HEART, TWIN PEAKS) and cinematographer Peter Deming (HBO's HOTEL ROOM, ABC's ON THE AIR).
A year and a half before LOST HIGHWAY was written, Sweeney had been preparing to begin work on another Lynch script. The producer didn't like the rewrites as much as the first draft, and told him so. "It kind of took the steam out of his enthusiasm for the project," said Sweeney. "It was a little tough for me to be honest with him, and it was hard for him to take it. So, it was with no little trepidation that I read LOST HIGHWAY, and I ripped through it. It was a great read, and I was so excited in doing it."
Sweeney is producer with Tom Sternberg and Deepak Nayar, who served as onset producer, while Sweeney picked up the reins during post-production, when her editing skills came into play. Despite the free-flowing nature of the film, Sweeney admits to no problems piecing the work together. "Working with David is just great," she said. "He's an all-around filmmaker, very involved every step of the way, certainly in editing, which is very important. We work together very well. There was absolutely no fear; I told him what I thought all the time, and sometimes he wasn't thrilled. I'll make a first cut during production; he gives me many notes and goes on his way. I'll make the changes, and he comes back. He had confidence in me, and our communication was good enough that he could tell me what he wants, knowing he'll get it. If it doesn't work on the cutting end, he accepts that. We do collaborate, but he is very much the director in the cutting room."
Conventional films can be
restrictive in their linear narratives, but those restrictions provide guidelines for the filmmakers to follow: the leading man
wouldn't disappear in the middle of the picture, and the film
wouldn't end in the middle of a
car chase. Still, editing LOST
HIGHWAY was not as wide
open as one might imagine.
"All of that's in the script," said
Sweeney. "David knew exactly
what he wanted, and it's
enhanced beautifully by the
way he shoots things and how
visual the film is. Working with
him and getting dailies makes
every day Christmas-all of the
crew shows up; you can't
believe what you're seeing; and
it's all so exciting. It wasn't a
walk on the wild side for me.
The film is very close to the
script.
"What's interesting with David is you have to cut knowing how you're going to work it out, which I do know very well," Sweeney continued. "You can trust certain things that feel awkward. He knows exactly what he's going to do, and it's going to be full of sounds. David does the sound design for LOST HIGHWAY. You just know the footage is going to be greatly enhanced. It's as old as the hills in filmmaking; the way you cut a scary sequence with music enhances it. There are sequences like that in the film. The transformation from Fred (Pullman) to Pete (Getty) has got terrific sounds."
Musical is another element that enhances a film, and LOST HIGHWAY mixes existing material from David Bowie, Smashing Pumpkins, Trent Reznor, Nine Inch Nails, Lou Reed, and Marilyn Manson (who appears in the film as 'Porno Star #1'), with an original score by Lynch collaborator Angelo Badalamenti (BLUE VELVET, TWIN PEAKS).
For LOST HIGHWAY, most of the score was recorded in Prague, with additional compositions done in London. "David and Angelo work together in such a way," says Sweeney, "that long before they went to Prague, they had a couple sessions where they sat down and came up with some melodies that Angelo eventually translated to orchestral arrangements. Some of the music, like the end title music by David Bowie, was chosen by David in pre-production. He knew right away that's what he wanted for the end titles. Billy Corgan, Trent Reznor and some of that other stuff came in at the eleventh hour, and we had to figure out a place for them. We actually replaced a song with a song from Smashing Pumpkins.
"Music came in different stages," Sweeney continues. "All through post-production, David listened to music. He listens to music while he thinks about writing. It's really integral to him. He knows when something is completely ready and when it's not. We use temporary music tracks, but the problem with temp tracks is you aren't using what you want in the end. The music will change, and your picture changes in how it's cut, which changes the internal rhythm of a scene and how it feels. We only use temp music as part of the process of selection. Once a song is in there, it's pretty much going to stay, except in that one case."
Another important key to the film's effectiveness is its cinematography. Unlike the brightly-lit comedies Peter Deming has worked on, such as MY COUSIN VINNY, LOST HIGHWAY offers a grayish, murky world of all-encompassing darkness. During the 1940s and 1950s, the heyday of film noir, black-and-white film stocks were used that were much slower and rendered shadows much more effectively that color stocks.
Lynch originally hoped to shoot LOST HIGHWAY in black-and-white, but the financial realities of releasing a monochrome picture to a color-spoiled audience kept that from happening. "In retrospect," said Deming, "I don't think filming in black and white would have been the right way to go." To realize his noirish world, Lynch let Deming shoot LOST HIGHWAY in varying levels of darkness. The film is a little creepier than something that has contrast, with few exteriors or daylight scenes. Whenever he could, Deming consciously used hardly any light at all to keep contrast down.
"There are many places in the movie where I would normally use a back light, but didn't," Deming laughed. "So you have people kind of melding into the background. It's kind of an extension of when Fred walks down the hallway and disappears; it's keeping that feeling through the rest of the movie. In another film, a director would say, 'What about a back light? and 90-percent of the time I'd put it there, but not for this movie. That was kind of fun.
"Sometimes I did things that, in other films, would be looked at as a mistake," Deming continued. "In this film, it may have been a mistake to begin with, but you embrace it!"-he laughed--"I took the look as far as I could. I've been watching David's work since ERASERHEAD, and had a feeling of images that he likes, both in watching his work and talking with him."
To ensure their planned darkness wouldn't be 'corrected' by a well-meaning processing lab, Deming kept in daily contact with the lab developing LOST HIGHWAY. He would warn the lab that they would be getting more of the same - either under or over exposed - and told them not to adjust the contrast. Deming was going for a "thought-out" darkness based on talks with Lynch, who usually left final lighting-or lack of it-up to his cinematographer.
" We talked about two or three scenes before we started shooting," Deming said. "Basically, we just talked about color and things like that. Once we rehearsed a scene, we discussed how dark he wanted to go. He would rehearse while I watched. Then he would go away as I lighted the scene. If he had any comments about the lighting, he would always mention them. Fortunately it wasn't too often, but it did happen. It's not something I dread. I kind of look forward to it."
Deming relied on spot metering and cranked-down F-stops
when shooting dark scenes.
Some sequences became so dark
that viewers have to lean forward and squint to see what is
happening on screen. "I remember when Oliver Stone's JFK
came out," said Deming.
"[Cinematographer] Bob
Richardson did a lot of cool
stuff with over exposure, burning people out. I joked that
maybe I'll do the same thing
with underexposure. Somehow,
I don't think it will take off
quite as much. The thing I
wanted to achieve was giving
the feeling that anything could
come out of the background,
and to leave a certain question
about what you're looking at.
The film is working under the
surface while you're watching
it."
This modus operandi sets up
the Mystery Man who at first
seems almost a subliminal
presence, until he makes eye
contact and steps forward.
Another image that LOST
HIGHWAY offers to keep
viewers talking is Fred's transition into Pete. Not only do
main characters change (or do
they?), but the plot goes off
into another direction (or does
it?). Deming did several things
to visually distinguish Fred's
and Pete's stories. "Fred's story
is certainly darker than Pete's,"
Deming said. "For Pete, we did
a little more with weird compositions. To try to get inside his
head, David kept throwing the
focus out of scenes by pulling
the lens in and out while we
were shooting. I think we also
backed off the color a little bit
from the richness in the beginning of the movie. But we didn't want to drastically change
looks because for most people
who see it, the first connection
is that these two guys are the
same guy. Because of that, you
don't want to distinguish the
two sections of the film too
much."
Pete's story comes across as the more classically narrative of the two (or is it just the one?) stories. Fred's story takes place primarily in his house, whereas Pete's tale is a bit more mobile. To further confuse clarity, which gleefully seems to be Lynch's forte, Fred appears to become Pete, then switch back again. More of the transformation was shot than actually used. Lynch's sensibility is not to give audiences too much information about what is really happening, preferring to let them imagine details from the snippets offered.
With all the planning, a few happy accidents during production did catch Lynch's fancy. One such happenstance occurred during the rehearsal of a dolly shot. At the end of the rehearsal, Lynch saw the image on a monitor as the dolly was being brought back to its original position, while the camera remained stationary. The director liked the resulting image better than what was planned and wound up using it.
Another time, first assistant
director Scott Cameron was
changing lenses, as Lynch sat
by looking at the monitor. The
screen went from sharpness at
one focal length, to blur, to
focus, at a new focal length. He
was impressed with the image
and decided to experiment with
it while shooting. But for all
the planning and lucky breaks
in the world, filmmaking, at
best, is a perfect physical representation of Murphy's Law,
and Deming found himself
challenged by LOST
HIGHWAY's excursions outdoors, where scenes were suddenly bright and contrasty,
compared to the created murk
of the film's interiors. The
biggest challenge came with
the nighttime desert scenes,
when aesthetics became secondary to mere logistics.
"The weather alternated between cold and wind, dusty and dirty," said Deming. "We had a lot of different lighting elements with us. The rig for Fred's drive at the end was pretty elaborate; we had a semi with two generators pulling us in order to have enough power to do what we needed. It was a pretty interesting image as it drove through the middle of nowhere, with everything around it black as night."
The first cut of LOST HIGHWAY ran two-and-a-half hours. Mary Sweeney hand-picked an audience of 50 people of varying backgrounds and ages to get a variety of impressions. Lynch knew the film was too long, and realized what had to be cut, and the comments of the 50 solidified for him what had to go, even though some of the decisions were difficult to make."There was a lot of stuff
about Pete's life with his buddies," said Sweeney. "There
were a couple of great scenes
that were visually so fantastic
that I hated to lose them, so we
kept them in. Pete goes out
with his friends, first to the
drive-in, then to the bowling
alley, where he's dancing with
Sheila (Natasha Gregson
Wagner), and both of those
scenes are significant. We lost
a lot in that area, and immediately after the transformation
there are a couple of things that
weren't moving the story forward. It all had to do with
Pete's life, which were scenes
that weren't going to give people the answers they were
looking for. Those scenes were just
hanging there."
The film was eventually cut down to two hours, ten minutes. An earlier scene that was lost illustrated the tenuous relationship between Fred and his wife. It was one of those character-revealing scenes that could be done without. If it happened to be a clue as to the ultimate meaning of LOST HIGHWAY, we'll never know. The film is meant to cause discussion, but such films can lead well-intentioned amateur philosophers astray as they lock onto insignificant scenes or actions, thinking them to be genuine clues. If viewers do that with LOST HIGHWAY, Sweeney and Lynch will be quite pleased to have stirred the viewer anyway.
"David sings praises to those people," says Sweeney. "He gives a lot of details. People give the film a significance that tells part of their own story, and that makes David so happy. I've had people give very funny reactions. There are all kinds of explanations for who Patricia Arquette (playing both Fred's wife and Pete's girlfriend) is; Fred is having a dream about the type of person he'd like to be with, or someone he used to be with, or she's his alter ego. People come up with great stories and I can't say if they're right or wrong. Students write their theses on David's movies- and they write fascinating things- but it's not what David was thinking when he made the film. People read a lot into his work. I think it's great. You stimulate people.That's very satisfying for an artist."
Sweeney hopes audiences will embrace
LOST HIGHWAY for
the intentionally unresolvable puzzle it was meant
to be, and don't resent the
lack of concrete answers.
Lynch's intention was to bring
dreams into the theaters that
viewers can connect with on
their own terms, not on the
filmmaker's.
"David has a very strong vision, and in other ways he's very reckless," says Sweeney. "He has no fear. The more well-known you get, the more difficult that becomes. I'm very proud that he's still 'out there.' He's always lamenting that he wants to change his name, get a wig, grow a beard, make a movie as a complete unknown and see how people take it. His films are so recognizable that he couldn't do that, but could another person come along and make something like this? It's an interesting question."
Lynch's reputation certainly precedes him on everything he does, but he finds that to be a good thing."You find out when you screen a movie for people how it's going," he says, "but you don't really know how large a section of the population is going to take it. You have to check things within yourself, let that be your guide and hope for the best when it's finished. The only thing you can do is make your film and not worry about what will happen. Just stay true to yourself."
Pages 32-33, 35, 37-38, 40-41
Copyright 1997 Frederick S. Clarke
Back to the Lost Highway articles page.